
Were the Tocharians related to the Tarim mummies - Eupedia
2011年12月7日 · It seems to be that the Tocharians were a late arrival from Siberia, and that they were R1b-M73 because R1a just wouldn't make sense for an early Centum language nor for a bronze age culture in Siberia starting 5600 years ago. There is a way to know who is right.
The Tocharians - Indo-Europeans of the East. | Eupedia Forum
2020年12月25日 · The Tocharians were an Indo-European people and the easternmost branch of Indo-European culture. Despite their eventual location in the Tarim Basin of Xinjiang province in western China, their cultural and linguistic links to Central and Northern Europe are stronger than to the neighbouring Indo-Iranians, a parallel branch of Indo-Europeans who dominated the Eurasian steppes until the Mongol ...
Kings of Khotan are likely O2-M117-CTS5308-Y26378, R1B2 …
2024年5月8日 · In reality, the Tocharians have very limited influence on other groups of people. Instead of being conquerors, they themselves were conquered by the qiang/Tibeto-Burman people (cts5308) Khotan’s own founding myth is that the western tribe King Duowen was conquered by a tribe from the east, and the Khotan Kingdom was born after mixed blood.
Question about the relation of Tarim Mummies and Tocharians.
2015年10月17日 · Hi, For about a certain time, i'm thinking on the point that R1a - blond hair and satem languages + plus R1b red hair and centum languages seems to have a good continuity, one of the point who escape at that theory is the Tarim Mummies than a lot of person relate to the Tocharians. I've learn...
R1b es el haplogrupo más común en Europa Occidental, alcanzando porcentajes superiores al 80% de la población en Irlanda, las Tierras Altas de Escocia, el oeste de Gales, la franja atlántica
R1b-M73 is Tocharians? | Eupedia Forum
2018年12月30日 · R1b-M73 is Tocharians? Messages 268 Reaction score 23 Points 18 Ethnic group Kurd Y-DNA haplogroup I do not know
Who were R1b1b1 people | Eupedia Forum
2011年3月23日 · Before there was a closer resolution of R1b subclades, it was speculated if R1b was connected with the Tocharians (ie, Indo-Europeans), especially given how the Tocharians also spoke a Centum Indo-European language (akin to Celtic, Italic, Germanic and Greek, but dissimilar from the Balto-Slavic and Indo-Iranic languages).
Anatolian hypothesis / Illyrians are not Indo-Europeans?
2022年2月20日 · Around 4000 BCE, the proto-Indo-European community split into Greek-Armenian-Indo-Iranians, Celto-Italo-Tocharians, and Balto-Slavo-Germanics. At around 3000–2500 BCE, Greek moved to the west, while the Indo-Aryans, the Celto-Italo-Tocharians and the Balto-Slavo-Germanics moved east, and then northwards along the …
The genomic origins of the Bronze Age Tarim Basin mummies
2021年10月29日 · The later Tocharians probably absorbed these people, but I believe they were a mix of post-Afanasievo populations and Iranians. The former gave the Tocharians their unique and very basal Indo-European language, and the latter were responsible for “European” physical features so noted by the Han Chinese chroniclers in the 1st millennium A.D."
Steppe as secondary PIE | Eupedia Forum
2016年10月10日 · There is a lot R1a-Z93 and huge amounts of the Iranian Plateau (Aryan) DNA in the areas where the Tocharians lived. In those areas of the ancient Tocharians there are no 'European' haplogroups. Central Asia is mostly J2a and R1a-Z93. R1a-Z93 can't be from Europe. That's impossible since all ancient ancestros have been found on the Iranian Plateau.