2025年1月24日 · Dear reader, this topic created to provide info about the mentioned vehicle. Synopsis: First experience: After when i shot all my four Rocket with my BMD-4 and start to attack enemy and i got a hit and in kill camera i saw , enemy shot hit one of my rocket which i consumed earlier, In x-ray the not existed rocket explode and archive a kill. So the consumed rockets not …

2024年12月26日 · 9.3 for the BMD-4 and 4M is too low compare to other IFV/Light tank, I know their armour can easily get pen by 7.62 but it firepower and the mobility is way outstanding in it BR. Just look at some of the IFV in game which having similar position with it, the chinese ZBD04 and british Desert Warrior are at BR 10.0. I not saying that it need to go 10.0 but it also not …

2024年12月11日 · The BMD-4M is one of the most modern modifications but remains largely unchanged in terms of weaponry compared to the BMD-4, instead featuring a new 500 HP engine. This vehicle has an interesting weapons layout: a 100 mm cannon that can fire shells and even launch guided missiles, complemented by a 30 mm automatic cannon, good against ...

2024年12月10日 · There is no reason to make a vehicle, the bmd4, a premium. We already had an event vehicle and the bmd 4 is in mass use by the russian army, so why is it a premium? Same with the su33, its a naval variant of the flanker, so why is it a squadron vehicle, which will take at least 3 months to grind for free. (btw it has 48 CM and no ARH missiles) This literally seems …

2023年12月22日 · Is there any BMD-4 that could POTENTIALLY be added for the finnish sub-tree ? Soviet equipment simply has finnish camos cus Gaijin didnt want to make finnish TT back in the day, who had this camo on their soviet vehicles. So they just gave all of them finnish camos, even if its unhistorical. And no, BMD-4 is Russian and only currently used by ...

2024年12月11日 · Yes, essentially. Besides the better mobility and better reload, the BMD-4 is pretty much functionally identical to the BMP-3. Access to APFSDS doesn’t matter because the BMP-3 could use it in game too if Gaijin implemented it, as BMP-3 …

2024年3月15日 · After playing the ZBD04A I do think it is slightly overtiered, both the 2S38 and BMP-2M are much better and only .3 BR higher while the BMD-4 is .7 lower in BR and is much closer in performance. In my opinion the main problem is the mediocre mobility (24hp/t but slow acceleration, bad traction characteristics and ~35°/s turret rotation speed compared to 60°/s …

2024年4月16日 · LWS is not very helpful at present times, they have same 4s reload, but BMD4 has 9m117m1, which has 150mm more pen. 150mm does not seem a lot, but it means that Abrams’ hull + leopard 2 A4 hull can not go through. This is critical at 9.7, you will be facing such vehicles. BMD 4 also enjoys a better mobility.

2024年12月27日 · Low survivability, sure, but it gets lethality and mobility - one of the best at that BR range. The mobility is its survivability, and being able to run away or get to the flank of enemy tanks extremely quickly makes it incredibly good. BMP-3 does not have the great reverse speed that the regular BMD-4 gets, nor does it get the 5s reload ATGMs or the great acceleration …

2024年3月15日 · Why is one 9.0 and the other 9.7? The only difference I can detect is APFSDS which adds 20mm of pen, but beyond that it seems the BMD has way faster turret rotation, faster elevation, a better ATGM, 70km/h reverse opposed to 17km/h… the ZBD does get laser warning and a better layout, but does that really result in a .7 BR increase? Also reminder the Type 87 …