2004年4月13日 · The R6.2 is the only completely reliable Leica I have ever owned (unlike most of my various . Ms which have all had shutter problems or failures in the last few years). The weakness part of the R6.2 though is the DOF preview lever. The mechanism behind it . is so weird and complicated that it is v.easy to break by the ham-fisted.

2008年2月2日 · The R6-2 contained no Minolta components. All the components were either manufactured or sourced by Leica. So the purity of the Leica DNA in the R6.2 may account for its greater perceived value. Apart from the higher 1/2000 shutter speed, the R6.2 also has a reputation for excellent reliability.

2002年6月14日 · I respect Leica very much but there are still people how believe in the Leica myth and think that by using Leica, the quality of their photographs will dramatically improve. Well, it won't! Salgado will still take a much better photograph with an ilford throw away single use camera than most people here will do with an R6.2 and a 1,4 80mm lens.

2011年11月13日 · Der der R6.2 bietet neben dem der R6 nicht nur die 1/2000 Sekunde, sondern auch ver-besserte Ablaufeigenschaften, da mit einer verringerten Masse. Zudem hat sie eine neue. Steuerautomatik bekommen, die eine perfekte Konstanz der Belichtungszeiten bieten. soll ( laut Leica ). Für dich eigentlich wirklich relevant:

2018年6月12日 · There are a number discussions concerning the reliability and build quality of the Leica R6 here, and elsewhere, on the web. These are mostly ten to fifteen years old and many of the problems reported seem in the realm of "infant mortality", that is, manufacturing defects which appeared in new cameras and presumably were corrected under ...

2016年12月21日 · Somit sollte eine weitere Reparatur der R6.2 gewährleistet werden. Am Rande erwähnt: Die R6 wurde von 1988 bis 1992 hergestellt. Abgelöst wurde sie 1992 von der R6.2, welche bis 2002 im Lieferprogramm blieb. Die letzten Lose wurden, lt. Fachliteratur, in hellverchromt hergestellt. Gruß. Thomas. Edited December 21, 2016 by thowi

2012年3月18日 · The lack of low light meter sensitivity on the SL is a disadvantage compared to the later Rs, but I enjoyed the SL for many many years. Still on balance I still preferred the R6/R6.2 for every day practical use. I didn't opt for the R7 in 1991 as it was bigger than the R6 and I like small, but it is a good machine.

2010年8月3日 · Pfff, now it looks much harder to choose one:) I guess every Leica camera is an extraordinary camera. I love how my Leica R4 and R5 performs, I own a couple of Elmarit-R lenses, all of them the first versions. I much prefer fully mechanical cameras that´s why I wanted R6.2 but the prices I´ve found were much more than I can afford.

2017年9月2日 · It is not a "great" camera, and is overpriced as are most things Leica, but I liked it the best of the Leica reflex bodies in actual use. It's totally manual shutter fits in with the original Leica ethos, which is partly why it is so expensive to buy these days. I preferred the R6.2 to the R6 for a few fairly trivial reasons.

2008年1月8日 · But the R6/R6.2 cameras are also very well made - BTW, the only "usable" difference between them is the R6.2 is a stop faster than the R6 (2000 top stutter speed vs. 1000, respectively). IMHO, the R6/R6.2 cameras were the best incarnation of any of Leica's SLR cameras since the SL/SL2.