2016年4月1日 · An Outer Marker (OM) or suitable substitute (refer to subparagraph 9c and Appendix A) is only required to indicate the final approach fix (FAF) for Nonprecision Approach (NPA) operations (i.e., localizer only). The FAF on CAT I/II/III ILS approach operations is the published glideslope intercept altitude, not the OM.

2011年1月12日 · Marker Beacons. An Outer Marker (OM) or suitable substitute (refer to subparagraph 9c and Appendix A) is only required to indicate the final approach fix (FAF) for Nonprecision Approach (NPA) operations (i.e., localizer only). The FAF on CAT I/II/III ILS approach operations is the published glideslope intercept altitude, not the OM.

2010年1月13日 · Does hearing the outer marker on approaches designed like this a requirement to shoot a legal approach? Take note it is the FAF. The aircraft is equipped with a CNX80/480, WAAS and IFR Certified, so I am able to identify the marker position displayed by on the screen. And the localizer/glideslope needles are functioning correctly.

2016年4月1日 · Also looked at FAA Order on ILS and it says: b. Marker Beacons. An Outer Marker (OM) or suitable substitute (refer to subparagraph 9c and Appendix A) is only required to indicate the final approach fix (FAF) for Nonprecision …

2012年2月2日 · b. Marker Beacons. An Outer Marker (OM) or suitable substitute (refer to subparagraph 9c and Appendix A) is only required to indicate the final approach fix (FAF) for Nonprecision Approach (NPA) operations (i.e., localizer only). The FAF on CAT I/II/III ILS approach operations is the published glideslope intercept altitude, not the OM.

2010年5月18日 · If you can get vectors to final, you can still fly the approach as either an ILS (using GS intercept for the FAF) or as a LOC (if you have a marker beacon receiver to get the OM as the FAF). And, of course, if you have an IFR GPS, you can still fly the full procedure as though you had the ADF/NDB both working, even though the underlying navaid ...

2016年1月25日 · First time I heard a marker go off I wasn't even aware of what they were in the airplane. I was a student pilot on a solo cross country and flew over one. Volume was way up and it startled the s**t out of me. Every thing still seemed to be running fine, I landed and got my education on marker beacon receivers from another pilot on the ramp.

2010年10月31日 · Many DME recievers can be slaved to NAV 1 or NAV 2 or operate independently. Las Vegas ILS Rwy 25L, The DME portion of the approach is from the VORTAC, so you need to tune your ILS Receiver (normally NAV 1) to the ILS Freq and tune your DME receiver or NAV 2) to the VORTAC for the DME portion and slave the DME to NAV 2.

2011年7月26日 · Refer to the DEN ILS RWY 35R procedure. The FAF intercept altitude is: (A) 7080 feet MSL, (B) 7,977 feet MSL, (C) 8,000 feet MSL It says the correct answer is 8,000 feet but I don't understand why. The explanation says: 8,000 feet MSL (lightning bolt symbol) is the glide slope intercept when using the ILS (precision) approach procedure.

2015年12月23日 · Yeah I knew that, I just wanted to further clarify that a vor receiver can be used for the localizer, because in the FAR AIM, it doesn't actually say that an ILS receiver is required to shoot an approach at class B airports where you typically see ILS systems. It only says that, "for IFR operations, you need either a Vor or Tacan receiver".