
英特尔® 酷睿™ i9-11900K 处理器
英特尔® 酷睿™ i9-11900K 处理器(16M 高速缓存,睿频至高可达 5.30 GHz) 规格快速参考、功能和技术。
Intel® Core™ i9-11900K Processor
Intel® Core™ i9-11900K Processor (16M Cache, up to 5.30 GHz) quick reference with specifications, features, and technologies.
Amazon.com: Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up …
$4.65 delivery Wednesday, April 9. Details. Or fastest delivery Monday, April 7. Order within 20 hrs 24 mins. Details. Select delivery location. Only 1 left in stock - order soon. $ $359.00 359. …
Intel Core i9-11900K Specs | TechPowerUp CPU Database
Mar 11th, 2025 AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Review - Great for Gaming and Productivity; Controversial News Posts. AMD RDNA 4 and Radeon RX 9070 Series Unveiled: $549 & $599 …
14nm的终末之旅!Intel i9-11900K最深评测 - 快科技
2021年4月6日 · 在付出相当大的功耗代价之后,只是可以打平amd同等核心的锐龙7 5800x,对锐龙9系列已经是望之兴叹了。 当然相比于当年的AMD,现在的Intel其实并没 ...
Intel Core i9-11900K Review - PCMag
2021年3月30日 · Die-hard gamers and Intel loyalists can safely opt for the "Rocket Lake" Core i9-11900K, Intel's mainstream 11th Generation flagship desktop CPU. But a regression in core …
Intel Core i9-11900K Review - World's Fastest Gaming Processor?
2021年3月30日 · The i9-11900K is priced at US$539 in 1,000-unit tray quantities, which should put its retail starting price at around $550, the same pricing territory as AMD's 12-core Ryzen 9 …
UserBenchmark: Intel Core i9-10900K vs i9-11900K
Intel’s Comet Lake flagship, the i9-10900K, is the fastest gaming and desktop CPU currently available. This ten-core hyperthreaded processor can easily be overclocked so that all twenty …
Intel Core i9-11900K - Core i9 11th Gen Rocket Lake 8-Core 3.5 …
+ $9.99 Shipping; View Details . Meet Your Seller. Weixun's Store. See Seller Store; FOLLOW. Get Educated. Make informed decisions with expert advice. Learn More. Customer images …
- 评论数: 734
Intel Core i9-11900K Review: Not a Great Flagship CPU
2021年4月2日 · The new 11th-gen processor was slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X by 6% in this gaming test. The Star Wars: Squadrons results are a bit brutal. Here the 11900K is 9% slower …