The CANUKA developers set a threshold of ≤ 1 for safe discharge from the emergency department. Of the remaining scoring systems available for UGIB the AIMS65 score has been well-validated to predict mortality. Our aim was to compare the CANUKA and AIMS65 scores for mortality and combined patient outcomes. METHODS:

2023年7月1日 · Background: The Canada-United Kingdom-Adelaide (CANUKA) score was developed to stratify patients who experience upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) to predict who could be discharged from the emergency department. Our aim was to determine if the CANUKA score could be utilized for UGIB in-patients undergoing endoscopy in predicting adverse ...

AUGIB是临床常见危重症之一， 十二指肠溃疡 、 胃溃疡 、 食管静脉曲张破裂出血 是AUGIB的三大主因，在第一时间对患者实施快速而有效的诊疗是抢救患者生命、改善患者预后的关键。 国际共识推荐对患者进行风险评估，风险分级可用于评估患者死亡、再出血的风险，指导医生把握临床干预、入院、出院的时机。 为此，一系列的评分系统也相继问世，当前，国内外应用广泛且较为成熟的预测评分系统主要是 Rockall评分系统 与 Blatchford评分系统。 Rockall评分系统根据患者的 …

canuka评分可作为预测接受内镜检查的ugib患者不良结局和死亡率的有用工具。 这可以帮助临床医生在患者护理方面做出更明智的决定，并有可能降低可以安全出院的患者的住院率。

Another relatively recent risk score, the CANUKA was published in 2018. Developed through multivariable logistic regression modelling of 10,639 cases pooled from across Canada, the UK and Australia, it is designed to predict a composite endpoint of 30-day mortality, rebleeding, and requirement of intervention or red blood cell transfusion.

We developed a scoring system (CANUKA) that had similar performance to the GBS in predicting patient outcomes and it more accurately identifies patients at low risk for adverse outcomes.

2019年10月1日 · The CANUKA score was developed using data from 10,639 patients with UGIB [17]. It uses age, presenting features, co-morbidity, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, haemoglobin and urea to predict a composite adverse outcome composed of death, re-bleeding, surgery or interventional radiology (IR) to treat bleeding, endoscopic therapy or RBC ...

2019年5月1日 · We developed and validated a new score, the CANUKA score, which can identify patients at high risk of adverse outcomes, as well as patients at low risk of harm, who could be managed safely as an outpatient.

This review discusses the performance of the Rockall score, pre-endsocopy Rockall score, Glasgow-Blatchford score, AIMS-65 and newer scores such as Progetto Nazionale Emorragia Digestiva and CANUKA scores. The quality of external validation varies …

The ability of the new CANUKA score to discriminate mortality, rebleeding, therapeutic endoscopy, interven-tional radiology or surgery, or RBC transfusion was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). In addition, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative