Baby M (born March 27, 1986) was the pseudonym used in the case In re Baby M, 537 A.2d 1227, 109 N.J. 396 (N.J. 1988) for the infant whose legal parentage was in question. In re Baby M was a custody case that became the first American court ruling on the validity of surrogacy.

The depth of their conflict about Baby M, about custody, visitation, about the goodness or badness of each of them, comes through in their telephone conversations, in which each tried to persuade the other to give up the child.

The 1985 case of Baby M was a contentious one that made surrogacy the center of many issues; this included the legality of surrogate contracts, feminism, father’s rights, and reproductive rights, to name a few.

1999年3月21日 · Baby M – the girl who sparked a national debate over surrogate motherhood – turns 13 on Saturday. By all accounts, she is a friendly, happy girl, unaffected by her early fame and the continuing...

The Whiteheads fled to Florida with Baby M. Police in Florida forcibly removed the child from her grandparent’s home and turned the child over to the Sterns. At trial, the court held that the surrogacy contract was valid, it ordered Mrs. Whitehead’s parental rights

2023年12月15日 · Baby M (plaintiff) William Sterns entered into a surrogacy contract with Mary Whitehead (defendant), where she agreed to carry a child for him and his wife Elizabeth, for a fee. Following the child’s birth, Whitehead struggled emotionally …

2014年3月23日 · The custody battle over Baby M was the first time an American court considered the legality of surrogacy. Questions over the practice linger.

Now the Shrewsbury lawyer who represented surrogate mother Mary Beth Whitehead in the landmark Baby M case is back in the news, defending another woman who wants custody of the triplets she...

2021年1月6日 · In arguing for a more uniform, permissive legal posture toward surrogacy, the article addresses five central debates in the surrogacy literature. First, should the legal system accommodate those seeking conception through surrogacy, or should it …

A man and woman entered into a surrogacy contract, but the woman did not want to give the baby up after she gave birth. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Surrogacy contracts are invalid.