2024年11月17日 · The SU-39 would be sitting at 12.0 with R-27R1/T1s and 12.3 with RVV-AEs. And no, it wouldn’t and shouldn’t sit at 12.7 with the RVV-AE s, it wouldn’t as potent as the …

2024年11月8日 · “The plant produced the pre-production T8TM-3 aircraft, which made its first flight on August 15, 1995. From the same year, the vehicle received a new official name Su-39 …

2023年11月28日 · BVR does not equal high BR. Per the devs, efficiency in combat (both air and ground modes are factored but the exact metrics are unknown) is what determines BR. The …

2023年11月26日 · IMO the SU-25T already provides an option for an R-73 equipped ground pounding late frogfoot. The IRL difference between the SU-25T and the SU-39 was the ability …

2023年6月22日 · It’s also funny how 90% of the videos made on the SU-39 claim that its a miserable dog sh** aircraft that isn’t worth the money. Currently the SU-39 is being artificially …

2024年11月18日 · Prelude 13 days ago, a bug report about the SU-39 having the kopyo-25 radar but missing the missiles it would guide, the R-27ER1 and the R-77, was accepted. Below you …

2023年6月25日 · @Morvran Su-39, introduced in 1995, was promoted for export and the construction of a series of five aircraft for the Russian Air Force began in 1997 in Ulan-Ude. …

2024年5月15日 · Well, honestly, I think Su-39 would play the same at 12.0 BR, as it does at 11.3 BR. Just before the patch, I finished “spading” Su-25SM3 at 11.7 /12.7 BR. You could freely …

2023年6月21日 · I recently delved into researching the Su-39 and came across some fascinating information. Although it was primarily designed for close air support, I was astonished to …

2024年12月10日 · The Su-39 (aka Su-25TM) was designed to be a multi-tasking aircraft in the shell of the Su-25 attack aircraft. It was required to be all-weather and capable of fighting off …